Here is another amusing letter that arrived. It is evident that a person recently read "Russia" and writes:
"The answer is from the Protestant-reformist branch of the church.
N.L. "That is, the person who wrote, is a Protestant. And some sort of reformer as well."
"I just started to read your book. The words of the Dravidians and the Nagas were never related to the words “...they were naked, Adam and his wife, and were not ashamed of this in all respects”. It is clear why the church is so unhappy. For myself I can add that it's time to go back to learning the basics of language, ancient Aramaic, ancient Jewish, Greek and Russian.
Question: What do you imagine the word ‘naga’ to be about? (The text in the original document is in ancient Hebrew ) The word ‘naga’ is only a translation from ancient Hebrew". And signed, Ilya.
ANSWER: Again, you read and you marvel at the ignorance of people. The fact is that the Dravidians and Nagas are ancient tribes who lived in India much earlier than the Jews appeared.
Even in those books that were written several years ago. "If you are a Jew," they brought them to me, and I read them. So, in this book they themselves write that the appearance of the Jews as a people occurred around 4,500 years ago. That is to say, before that there was no one at all!?
But our ancestors arrived in ancient India, where the Dravidians and Nagas lived much earlier. Not to mention the fact that on the territory of Russia the Slavic-Aryan state existed for more than 100,000 years. This is the first point.
The second point is, Nagi is the name of tribes, so a translation is not necessary, and it was written at that time in Russian. So, first there was Russian, and then there was an ancient Jewish one, which was translated from the Russian.
By the way, Academician Chudinov deciphered one ancient Jewish engraving, which shows how the talking bush conveys the tablets to Moses. Supposedy, arms hung out down nowhere and gave him the tablets. But if you simply turn the tables back the other way, not down, but up, that is what Chudinov.
Do you know what language it was written in? In Russian, with Russian letters. Because, all the alphabets came from that ancient alphabet, which could not be called Russian at that time, because those who flew to our planet did not call themselves the Russ or Slavs, and so on.
There were other names, but the language was the very one in which we are talking with you now. And it really is very ancient, at least research has shown that at the subconscious level the brain of any person (European) reacts specifically to Russian words. It is laid down at the genetic level, and not in their own native language.
At the inaugural congress of the movement which we held, a fragment was specially shown. Studies have shown that people of any nationality (of the white race) reacted to the (Russian) word for "dog" (dog). And yet such a reaction is not to be expected.
But the most intriguing thing is that the Greek Aramaic language arose much, much later. And that's why when in the Bible, in the Old Testament it is written "nagi" in that sense, with a small letter, as if naked, everyone who reads understands it that way.
Regardless of what language it is written. Therefore, when people shout about something, if they read the book that is now banned, then they should remember that I'm actually deciphering where this understanding arose from, that on the contrary, it is really not connected with nudity. That is, the person didn’t even read a thing.
He stumbled upon some word that didn’t suit him, and began to criticize. Most who criticize my books, when their opponent asks, did you read the books?
– No, we didn’t
– So what are you criticizing?
– But we heard!
– What did you hear?
– Someone told us.
Therefore, concerning the antiquity of the language we are talking about, it is confirmed by a lot of research. All European languages belong to the group of Indo-European languages. But I always said this: "Indo-European languages originated in Ancient India.
Question. Is there a people living in India, or was there ever a people living in India who spoke such a language? And after careful searching you will find that there has never been such a people there.
But when the Slavic-Aryans arrived (the last migration was 2500 years BC), their (Indian) elite began to speak in Russian. And this is not my research, but that of other researchers, in which it is stated that 70% of Sanskrit words, namely ancient Sanskrit, is 100% Russian.
There are 2 Sanskrit languages. I didn’t know this either until recently. There is an Ancient Sanskrit, and there is a modern-new Sanskrit. The new one has already been changed a lot. And it is specifically the ancient Sanskrit that is is 100% Russian language. 70% of the words still exist in modern (Russian) language and in that (other).
The only difference can be due to what began to be forced on us in the 20th century; that ‘kArova’ should be written as ‘kOrova’ (cow). And in the Sanskrit kArova is ‘karova’. But it does not matter how we write, we do not say ‘KOROVA’. Everyone says to kArova.
And what is most interesting, Hindus who know ancient Sanskrit and travel to Russia, especially (to) the northern dialect (region), the European part, the Arkhangelsk region, are amazed because even the dialect corresponds to the memory that was imprinted in them from those times.
Perhaps someone has already read "The Tale of the Clear Falcon. Past and Present", in which I analyse and show that ‘Nastenka’, moving from planet to planet (of course, she moved around the planets from the conclave of white civilizations that created this colony) can understand everyone without problem. What does this say?
It suggests that the language was the very same for communication. That is, all the civilizations that participated in the creation of the colony on Earth once spoke the same language. This language was Russian. Only it was not called Russian then.
The important thing is not the name. Why did they begin to call it the ‘Russian’ language? From the name of one of the princes, whose name was – ‘Rus’. Just as the Scythians were called Scythians because the name of their prince was ‘Scyth’. They said, “ We are people of Scyth” and so they were called Scythians.
Sarmats, Prince Sarmat, Sarmats. These are not different tribes. I am amazed by the naivety of official historians who say, "The numerous tribes of Scythians ... of Sarmats, and so on, disappeared without a trace. No culture or burial grounds, nothing remains”.
They haven’t disappeared anywhere. They exist! Because Sarmats and Scythians, and so on, are the very same Rus! It is just by birth that they were separated and carried their original names, being the names of their princes.
That is to say, no one has disappeared anywhere! They live on, and they live in those places where they lived thousands of years ago. But why then do official historians somehow react strangely to this this.
Large groups of peoples disappeared without a trace. Nobody defeated them, nobody destroyed them, and they have not gone anywhere. For some reason, everyone engaged in history is writing about the Bulgarians. That the Bulgarians were forced out from the Volga, left, settled and mixed with the Southern Slavs, and formed Bulgaria.
Hungary is of the Finno-Ugric tribes. They were forced out too, and they left for central Europe and created their own Hungarian state there. For some reason everyone is talking about this! But where did the Scythians, Sarmats, Kermites and so on go? Many other tribes that are no longer there? Yes, they didn’t go anywhere! It is just that over time, their original name dissappeared and they began to be called not according to some prince, who ruled that area, but a generalised national name. That's all there is to it!
The level of education is always amazing. Here are 2 cases I cited, the first of course is stunning. I don’t know the ancient Hebrew language, did not learn it (in principle there is no need). What for? If I had studied the Hebrew language and translated the Torah, for example, what would they have told me?
I would have been accused of distorting the meaning. Therefore, it is better to take the Torah, which was translated by a Jew, and on which the chief rabbi put his seal, "I authorise it!" That is, everything is right there, and no one will say that I'm distorting something there. And besides, why should I study those languages when there are specialists who can professionally do it.
There are more important things to do. If I translated it myself, I would be accused of translating incorrectly because I don’t know the language. Therefore, the very best defence against such attacks is to rely on what they themselves translated and asserted. Then no one can say that (he) distorted something of the essence. And that they confirmed, and cannot refute, that they have a Chief Rabbi who turns out to be an extremist. They will not say that he affirmed this.
I recently had a meeting-come-interrogation with the investigator, for the fifth time trying to bring a criminal case, although for the fifth time it did not happen. So, I told him. Yes! I submit to the decision of the court, but this does not mean that I agree. The struggle will continue, because the book is not extremist because from my point of view, this book is anti-extremist because in this book I expose the super-Nazism, the super extremism that is reflected in the Torah.
And these are not just words. If you read the Torah, the quotes that I cited in the book are 100% accurately transposed from the book (Torah), completely show who is really an extremist. Therefore, with regards to the book, it does not mean that everyone has calmed down, that everyone has raised their arms in surrender. I for one, will never give up!
And the struggle for the book continues. Although they have temporarily had a victory, and not because they won a victory, but because the judges got an instruction. They did not care what arguments and facts were presented. They acted pure and simply in accordance with the instruction that was given.
It is not necessary to explain about when an order is given. You also have probably faced such situations more than once and heard about them. 'Our court is the most humane court in the world! The most just and humane!' Remember, in the film “Caucasian captive”? In Soviet times that was the case too. But what pleases, and you have probably heard, that an unusual form of revenge may occur.
The order came from the Prosecutor General’s office. Do you remember the recent event that was distorted, near Moscow? The Deputy Prosecturo General has already been temporarily suspended. And now the Prosecutor General is being asked to explain. That is to say, there are very interesting contacts arising in the prosecutor's office. In principle, with a criminal business. And this has already been revealed to the public. They could not hide, which makes me happy too. So, what sort of ‘good’ General Prosecutor's office do we really have at the present time?