https://youtu.be/ynsrEgsf5Bk 2.22.Question: What do you think of parallel worlds? Answer: Those parallel worlds described by science fiction writers are not what they really are. That is [they describe it as], a parallel world which is just about the same as ours. You can read more in the "The Anisotropic Universe", "The Last Appeal to Mankind", where I explain that the number of universes can be many. We live in one petal of the universe and [the universe] is parallel. But it is not parallel in the sense that there is another same universe. There are other universes that qualitatively differ from our universe. There are universes that are of the same quality, but they are in other places. Two or three years ago with the help of the Hubble telescope another discovery was made that very definitively confirms the positions I presented in books printed 10-15 years before that. "Hubble" discovered the so-called deflection of space, which they called a "white hole". A black hole is a deflection in one direction, and this white hole, this is a deflection in the other direction with a diameter of 1 billion light years, as they wrote. After a while an announcement appeared that they had begun to study this deflection of space and found that they could see another universe through it. So, if anyone remembers the picture of the first-order super-space in the book "The Last Appeal to Mankind" or "The Anisotropic Universe"". There I described when a spaces of identical dimensionality and structure are joined, the nodal points are the zero point of the transition. The zero point of the transition is when spaces that are qualitatively identical to each other are linking together. By chance the "Hubble" came across one point of transition and at this point of the transition you can really enter and find yourself in another universe. We do not see it anywhere, except through this white hole - this deflection. In another place we do not see it because the qualitative barrier does not allow us to see it. We can only see it in the linkage zone. So, this is also a parallel universe, which can be completely identical to ours, but there is no exact copy of our Earth. Maybe there will be a planet whose parameters are close to those of our Earth, but you will not find your twin there, as in parallel worlds where dozens of them exist. Here is Nikolai Levashov; only his fate is slightly different –that’s how you seen it in the films. The science-fiction authors have no idea of what is happening not only in other Universes, they do not even know what is happening on the nearest planet. You need to understand what sort of conclusions they reach. The same with our so-called theorists, woeful theorists. I already wrote an article about Einstein. Conclusions; this was a deliberate distortion to direct [science] down the false path. It was written by a man who didn’t have the slightest idea of the universe. And all of science is still based on this postulate of the "general theory of relativity" and "special theory of relativity." It is complete nonsense, disproven long ago and in many ways. It was disproved in his time and all the more so in recent times, proven that it is all nonsense! But for some reason modern science continues to rely on this nonsense. So much data has been obtained that the speed of light is not the ultimate speed of motion of material objects, that mass does not turn into some sort of infinity, that the Universe is not isotropic. What is isotropy? Uniformity; i.e. it does not change and is identical in different directions, to the right, to the left, up and down - all the same. This is absurd! Did everyone study at school? What is said about the structure of ordinary matter? There is a nucleus and the electrons rotate around the nucleus, and these electrons rotate at a certain distance from the nucleus. And now imagine a crystal lattice. What do we see? One nucleus is here, another nucleus there and what is between them? Nothing! Emptiness! 99% of the volume of physically dense matter is a void and there is nothing between the nucleuses. So where is the homogeneity of space? It’s absurd, even at this level of understanding. The crystal lattice is a physically dense substance, it has a certain ordered structure. Matter; the nucleus is located here, the other here between them, and these are repeated periodically, at the same distance on a straight line (they must be lines), depends on the kind of substance. But between this one and this other one is emptiness. The size of the nuclei which are tiny in comparison with the distance between them which can be compared with the distance between the Sun and the Earth. Imagine that any atom is [structured] in proportions similar to that of the solar system. The sun in the center, and is the nucleus, and the electrons are the planets. Is it far from the Earth to the Sun? At the scale of the Universe it’s nothing. But how long would it take it for us to get there? Quite a long time. Between the Earth and the Sun is a huge emptiness. Similar voids exist inside atoms, just in proportional scales of course. So where is homogeneity? It’s just that people have been taught not to think. Because if any school child asked such a question, I think physicists would have a hard time of it.
