2.17.Question: What is this dark matter which has gravity, and is included in this 90%?
Answer: Scientists called it a dark matter because they can’t see it. Look at the night sky, and look closely. What can you see? Stars and the rest is black.
They don't understand what the blackness is. Because our eyes are not able to see, it seems black. In fact, the whole of space is filled with matter which also has a colour. Just because they are not able to see it, they called this 90% of the matter that the universe is filled with, "dark matter".
Dark matter - is it dark or black matter? In fact, this is not correct. In my books I call this "primary matter". I prefer 'primary matter' because this matter is not black.
And the funniest thing is when some people get mixed up and say : "If Levashov wrote about “the dark matter generator ” then he must be involved in doing 'dark deeds's." Although I did write about the “psi-field generator" or "dark matter generator” because this generator indeed controls the flows of the so-called “primary materials”, and I also wrote about that.
But for some reason they choose not to pay attention to that , but only notice that I wrote "dark matter". "That means he's black! A black magician doing dark deeds." "Black matter" is just a provisional name that was introduced by physicists.
Sometimes I cite use both concepts for the sole purpose of ensuring that people don't think that "primary matter" and "dark matter" is something completely different. Because they chose to call "dark matter" that which I call "primary matter" and that's all there is to it. I use both terms to make the connection between the two.
Look, if something is named in such a way, but its actually this, then people can link them together. They will then understand what is being talked about.
(From the audience: "And what about black energy?") "There is not such thing as 'black energy' at all! I am a theoretical physicist myself. Energy is a property of matter. Energy does not exist separately from matter.
Some theoretical physicists are very fond of playing [with new concepts] but forget that behind the concepts are real things. So here's the thing; energy appears when matter passes from one qualitative state to another.
We burn fuel and at the same time we release energy which we put to work . The same happens with the speed of a car. The speed of a car does not exist without the car. Here comes a car, moving at a certain speed. This is an artificial term introduced to analyse the process of what is happening with matter.
'Black energy' is not some sort of separate term. Even dark matter passes from one state to another. And now 'dark energy' is supposedly released? You see, this is not the right term. It doesn't exist, in principle.
I can say the following: regarding 'black' or 'white' magicians, there is the concepts of 'dark forces' and 'light forces'. They both use the same matter. In other words, there is no separate matter for 'black magic' and another matter for 'white magic'. It is one and the same. Matter can not be black or white in principle.
But for those who create this black magic, it all depends on the kinds of programs and actions that the black magician puts into. That is what determines whether it becomes 'black magic' or 'white magic'. It is a function of the consciousness of the person who does it.
In one case, it may be positive, in another it’s negative. But the matter can't be neither black nor white. It does not have 'colouring' in that societal sense which we attribute to it.