1.8.Question: On the website midgard.info there is an article dated 24 January titled "Retribution is at hand" in which it is written that the Perun Coalition is preparing in the near future to occupy earth for the physical destruction of non-humans; dragon-like, robots and pest viruses, of which there are more than 40% on the earth. (The Slavonic-Aryan Vedas maintained, as is said, that such a coalition never existed. And that furthermore there is no concept of a Perun Coalition). What are you able to say about this?
Answer: Oh! Indeed, I can say - Oh! Because even the formulation of such theses is not the actual thing. There is no Perun Coalition. They don't need make a landing. What would be the point of such a landing? They are already present. They flew in and still arrive incognito because our planet was situated within the boundaries of the Pekel worlds (infernal worlds).
Pekel (infernal) worlds - the territory of social parasites, so-called, or Koshcheev as they are called. But the point is not in the title, what is important is the essence of what actually is. As long as the solar system was geographically located in the territory of the parasites, such an obvious arrival of the spaceships of forces of light would have provoked a new stellar war.
Therefore they mainly arrived through incarnation on Earth, like everyone else. It doesn't happen in any other way here. They didn't arrived by ship on official visits. Only parasites flew in on official visits having established contacts with different governments, including contact with our government at different times.
But they don't need to fly here, because even if they fly in, so what? The last time they flew in was when the Antis rebelled against the maternal empire - Great Asia. As a result, Fatta fell. It was blown up. Well, the question is - why it was necessary to blow it up? After the debris fell, what happened? The last glacial period, a change in the axis of 23.5 degrees, etc. Civilization was thrown back to the level of the Stone Age. This is a fact, whether we like or not like.
And what does this mean? Just as before, Svarog destroyed Lelia. Also Daaria withdrew to the bottom of the sea and there were also problems. Did they want bad things to happen? No. Its simply that in that moment, and at other times, they did not have the understanding and knowledge to neutralize all the enemies without causing debris to fall to Earth.
Its just that since that time I think they have advanced far ahead. I hope, they didn't stand still in their development. It means, at that time they couldn't do anything else. Because if they had been able to do something different, no debris or moons could have fallen. Yes, it was the lesser evil that they caused . But this lesser evil resulted in us now reaping the results.
Parasites nevertheless seized power in the world, and so we are now living under the occupation of the parasitic system. The real question is; why was it at all possible that that priests of Antlan could create that which they created? That is, all of a sudden they wanted you remember, the story of the old lady - "I don't want to be a noblewoman, I want to be Empress of the Seas, and have a goldfish be my servant".
Was it something they ate or drank which so affected their minds, that those priests suddenly decided that they would rule the world? Would a properly developing living being strive for this? No. So it means there were distortions. They had contacts with those controllers, with gods, who were watching them.
Do you remember Perun? Not Perun (from the audience - Dee!) Yes! He was the observer. It means they fed him disinformation. Just as they are now feeding it to us from our TV screens. And what happens?
At that time, our gods were accustomed that to tell a lie was just sheer nonsense; a sane creature would not lie. Because according to the cosmic laws, for any lie, influence would be wound back to zero. And they logically thought that if information is being provided, then it must be the truth.
But for such a rule to apply, those who provide the information must be at a certain level of development. They have to be people who understand what it is, and don't think along the lines of 'they needn't try to spin yarns to us, we weren't born yesterday', and we'll spread lies if it benefits us .
The habit was that they did not lie to each other because they know that for millions of years no one lied in those ancestral civilizations, from which our forebears came from. Why are we such a trusting people? Because we believe. Therefore, we believe that people won't lie. And this is used. I'm not calling for people to stop believing. But as our ancestors said, it is necessary to respect those who are worthy of respect, love those who are worthy of love, to help those who deserve help and to believe those who have earned trust.
That is, before believing someone, that person needs to to prove that he has the right to be trusted. But we trust anyone and everyone. Why? It still works out of a force of habit, we believe. They make fools out of us - and we believe. They tell us, deceitfully, we're doing everything for your good, etc. And people believe that the person really is telling the truth. Why? Because ingrained at the genetic level, over millions of years, and for hundreds of thousands of years on Earth, we believe that people tell the truth.
In a society where lying is the law, you can't be trusting, because this is being specifically pushed. And we are regarded as dolts and fools. Do you agree with this formulation? I for one don't agree. I'm not saying that you need to distrust everything, or to ignore everything. But it is first necessary that those in whom people believe, have earn and obtained that trust.
He proved that he can be trusted. But not anyone and everyone who has something to blather. Did you hear about that? (Keep in mind Megre). How many hundreds of thousands of people thanks to him, active people, the urban intelligentsia, were left with nothing, in some backwoods village, where they had not the slightest idea about what a 'family property' was.
Who got caught up in such a the trap, are there any here? That's right, you can have a family rural property . Do you know when? When we build a farm, on which there are hundreds of cows, where hired workers are working. That is with around fifty people or even a hundred. You pay them a salary. And, just as an employer, you get your income from the farm's profit, and live and work on your development.
It was possible then. And everything was done to ensure that people sold their apartments. And what's more, in addition, he ran a scam when he sold plots to the 'Anastasiets' for 10 times more than he purchased the land from the state. That is, he even profited from this.
People sold their apartments for a pittance, and were left with nothing, bought plots, built a house, and (Voice from the audience ),"This is wrong information!" - Really ? (From the audience) "Of course, yes. Nobody sold apartments. For example, not one of us here in the settlement sold (their apartment). " - Well OK, you may not be sold your apartments.
And of those who left the city , many sold their apartments. (From the audience) "We have more than a hundred properties in the settlement". That means there was some money. (From the audience) "And do you know how much the land there costs per hectare? 12 thousand rubles". Well maybe. So you were lucky.
Because most who traveled to Moscow, unfortunately, I know so many who sold their apartments. At that time, when they were worth only pennies. And now they are worth millions. Simply, and in any case, in order to really pick up and create your own family property, you need to have enough finances to establish production; a serious level of production, a farm level of production.
But you need to organize a lot of things, and have large funds behind you. To have talent as an organizer, to understand what agriculture is. Because I had to deal with people who want to do something, keeping bees for example.
And some person thought that if he listened to seminars for some time, he would get to know all he needed about bees, and that he would be able to make a profit from this as well. And the man did what he said, although people, including me, tried to convince him.
Because my grandmother, a professional beekeeper, was one of the best beekeepers of the Soviet Union. She even received a state award for it. Since my childhood I know about bees firsthand. I just describe to a person what to do, what you need to know so that beekeeping becomes genuinely profitable. The person didn't listen, he drove off, but didn't start to keep bees. But the fact is that this is not only because of the bees. Because people need to understand, to know and understand about these sectors in agriculture - it is hard work
An yet again, the same 'Kulaks' were dispossessed and exiled. Kulaks? Damn it, what kind of Kulaks were they? Five million were somehow deceived. Remember, those of the older generation? I guess the younger generation is no longer studying this, concerning the collective farm saga, when five million Kulak farms were collectivised.
Do you know how many people were exiled to Siberia, of whom most did not survive? There were five million farms - on average each with 6 people. On average, at the very minimum. Because in addition to grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, there were several children. This were at least two or three children. That was the minimum size! So count; from five million households multiplied by six you get thirty million, but there were even more.
And these people, the vast majority of them, plowed the field from dawn to dusk every day. Yes, during the harvest they hired additional workers who plowed alongside with them, and ate from the same table. What sort of 'Kulaks' were they? And yet they exiled them at first they did this to the aristocracy, and then came the peasants. Just count, how many millions were killed, because of the thirty million, that's the minimum estimate, in those families it was not just two children, as they have now. There were usually 5-6 children who usually survived childbirth.
How many millions of people were deported in wagons loaded like cattle and thrown out into the taiga. Just one shovel, one axe, one saw for the whole trainload of people. Those who had time to dig, dug themselves into a dugout. Those who didn't, well Siberia in the winter, you know!? If five million of them survived, that would be very good. Is this not an example of genocide? And how they exterminated.
After all, before the revolution Russia fed the whole world. You know what struck me? When I was still at school, I don't remember the details exactly, but the point is that when they took several major countries, the number of cattle in the US for the year 1975-1976 was less than the number of cattle herded into collective farms.
At that time the first World War began, the Civil War, and the Second World War. And after all this had happened then many farmers and landowners slaughtered their cattle, so as not to give them to the collective farms. And after that, how many died later in shed! Because when they herded the cattle, many perished also, because there never had been anything like this. And even after that the number of livestock was greater than in the United States during the 1970s.
Imagine how much wealth there was in agriculture? I think this is enough to have an idea of the scale of farming. Not to mention the fact that Russia fed half the world at that time. And do we now feed half the world? So, there are a lot of aspects that are being specifically developed. And for what was it being developed, like this, such as Anastasia? Because when a person doesn't know, or doesn't understand about the things that were written there, then of course it appears a revelation to him.
But when a person is at least little versed in this, you just wonder what kind of absurdity Maigret wrote in his books. This is just nonsense piled upon more nonsense. But the people for whom it was a revelation, hadn't ever heard or read anything , and they couldn't understand what and how. And they take it as the truth. Its the same as ' faith was blind'. That this man says sincerely. There's a lot of emotion, but apart from emotions there's nothing else.