1.1.Question: As a baptized person, at an early age the appropriate faith was instilled in me. I always instinctively knew that something was not right, that I was puzzled in the midst of all this deception, about the existence of Matrona of Moscow, Xenia of Petersburg, St. Seraphim of Sarov and other enlightened healers who strived for it, for the ability to heal, although they professed Christianity. How could that be?
Answer: The question is, you know, they have been declared as saints, and so on. Indeed, there were such people doing things, but I’m not going to set about researching each of them; who was who, and what they did. But I think that many of them really could heal, and so on.
A question: does this have anything to do which any church? Absolutely not. Not in the slightest. It has to do with genetics of these people who possess these gifts. And, due to the fact that they were in this environment, which obliged them to become a monk or a nun, and they were inside the church, in the bosom of the church. And they were then soon declared saints.
Because it was immediately perceived as coming from God; man is a conductor, and through him God heals, etc. And as I see it, the "Fathers" (I’m placing inverted commas deliberately) made really good use of such opportunities, and the position was this: even here, in the European part of of Russia, it didn’t manifest itself much.
Because in Western Europe, if one is familiar with the "The Witch’s Hammer", it was very simple, the Inquisition took a very simple position: if it is within the church – then it’s from God, if outside the church - it is of the devil. Not bad? One and the same thing: one – from God, the other - from the devil. And in order to free someone from the devil, he must be burned. As if the purifying fire frees man from the clutches of the devil.
What a lovely position! That is, all those who did not want to support the church's position were destroyed, because it is built entirely on lies. A total lie, not to mention the fact that the New Testament, etc., etc. Those who want can read about it. I’ve written something, and Svetlana also wrote about this in more detail. You can read and, indeed, there are many flaws, hundreds of mistakes, and one is simply surprised that people don’t notice then.
In principle, I’m not surprised. Why? Because there is an embedded program such that when a person is reading it, they only see and perceive that which the authors of program want them to see. That is, a lot of things they didn’t even both to leave unaltered. Because they were 100% sure that no one will ever be able to see the truth.
Has anyone read the book "The Hour of the Bull" by Efremov? Do you remember, he wrote about the island, which no one saw, even though they were there? He really conveyed such an image, a suggestive force so powerful that the inhabitants of that planet which he described, did not see the island. Although, those who came from another planet, they were able to see it perfectly.
That is to say, a powerful force worked on the people's consciousness, so that they perceived the material they had read as being that which was wanted by those who laid down that program; because the force acted at the subconscious level. Has everyone heard about the 25th frame? But this works a thousand times more effectively than the 25-th frame. And besides, people can't see it, can't hear anything and turn themselves into zombies.
Therefore, such things as the manifestation of some or other characteristics and qualities of people were precisely used. And now indigo-children are born, churchmen try to get hold of them immediately, get them zombifyed and use them in the sense that they came from the church and that is from God.
Because without all of this, the church is an empty phrase. Because there are no such miracles. Those healers, often without knowing or understanding the nature of their gift, often ruin themselves, children especially burn themselves out due to the fact that they don't understand what it is and how it works. And the church, or relatives (close or not very close relatives, oddly enough) make money.
And such as instances really do confuse and lead us astray. After all, they did do something didn't they? The fact that a lot of things occur, especially when a person has abilities to perceive and respond well, and there are no miracles or Divine inspiration involved. Christianity has been imposed on Russia for a thousand years.
As they say - two thousand years. Although it wasn't Christianity at all, but the cult of Osiris for two thousand years. But civilization has existed in our territory for about a hundred thousand years. But if there had been nothing before that, and then suddenly when a person came to the church it appeared that he was able to do something, then it would be another matter, without question.
But when a person already has a natural gift, and he comes to church, and works for the church and he is used (blindly or not), then it is in no way connected with the church. After all, were there healers, etc., before Christianity appeared? Of course there were! There were other religions at those times.
In principle, the Vedic worldview - it's not a religion, as many are now trying to say, that it's a new Vedist faith and they are trying to make it into a religion. It has never been a religion. It was an atheistic worldview. For them it was not a religion because they always said, "We are the children and grandchildren of Dazhbog". That is, those who were called gods, were men, just men, who had attained a certain level of informational development and were able to do some things which would have been impossible without attaining that level.
But they always said "We - are children and grandchildren". That is, our forefathers themselves said that. What does this mean? It means that the concept of God was replaced by another concept. How slyly it was afterwards replaced; for example, before there was the concept of a male or female life's companion . Sometimes the concept is still used. For me, let's say, the real Mary Magdalene was a companion of Jesus.
In those days it meant - his wife. Not bad? Although sometimes now it used in that sense. But one word was changed into to another, and 'companion' turned into referring just to whose who walked alongside another person. It would be more accurate to refer to "fellow travellers" . Isn't that soso? That is how the substitution of words is done, by replacing some words that give a different meaning. Or, through the word, 'the Lord God', even though our ancestors did not refer to 'the Lord God', but called referred to 'gods'.
It's just an evolutionary status, the qualitative development of one or another person who was able to reach the level of creation. When a person is able to create, this is already at the level of a god. But not in the sense that it is now understood, but in quite a different materialistic conception. Our ancestors were materialists, because they knew much more about the world.
Now when listening to clergy or professionals who comment on what happens after life, and life and death, you listen and think, what the hell, from where do they get such nonsense? I wanted to ask, apart from reading something, somewhere, do you know anything else? You read something, but nothing else other than from books?
But what'really happening? The airwaves are being filled with pseudo-information. A simple effect is being pursued. For example, if a person has heard something, then someone will speak about it. And they spread some nonsense around which immediately gives rise to rejection, for example.
When he hears something, a word of the same type, the person is straight away negatively disposed to it. He does not even want to listen to what's behind it. This is an information war. And a very serious one. Because its usual, and oh well, we know that already! OK, we do say some things, and what do you know about it? I have heard that such and such?
And now please explain what does it mean? And, oddly enough, they can't say anything. The fact of the matter is that it turns out to be the information war, which has been going on for a long time and people just don't pay attention to it.
But in any event, it is necessary to begin to think for ourselves. This doesn't mean that you have to deny everything and everyone and to become a nihilist. But I always hold to the position; a man is entitled to his opinion and this is his right. But if he starts to offer his opinion to others, he must prove it.
And if one proves to him that his opinion is wrong, he should give up his false opinion, apologise and admit that he was wrong, regardless of how unpleasant it is to give up your outgrown beliefs.
Unfortunately, most people continue to stick to their line even after it has been disproved. Again, unfortunately, the currently established social order, whether by choice or not, affects the consciousness of people, and the formation of a human being.
I don't whether anybody know, but there was once a time in China when people were deliberately made to be misformed. How? They took a terracotta pot with a strange shape and a child was put inside the pot. And so the child grew up and his body took the shape of the pot. When a child had completely filled the pot, the pot was broken and the child remained in the shape of the pot. This is the background to how a physical body was mutilated.
Social parasites, who for thousands of years have, in principle, been ruling the world, and who now increasingly find themselves in a state of agony were, none-the-less, doing the same with human souls. The soul can’t be seen from the outside. A pot was broken and a mutilated body was left.
But a human soul can’t be seen by most people. Isn’t that right? So the deformation or destruction, or blockages of person's development are not particularly noticeable. Besides, who has a knowledge of such things? Most people do not realize that, while under the constant influence of an informational, or rather pseudo - informational influence, a distortion of their own perception is also ocuring.
A normal person, after realising that he had kept following the wrong course due to insufficient information, should try to make progress for his own good. He would think “OK, I didn't take this into account, or I didn't consider that", and so on. And maybe he would reconsider his opinion, take the next step forward and discover something interesting. But no, unfortunately most people will say “OK, so I've understood something and that's as far as I want to take it. I don’t want to know anything else”.
To make it clear: on the one hand, this is due to objective and subjective reasons. As to the subjective, well it is the effect of the parasitic system, whereas from the objective side, well consider the following image that will make it easy to understand this situation.
Imagine that a person is on the ground floor level. So he goes out and looks around to see whatever his view can take in. So he can take in everything that is in his field of vision, right? Imagine now that there are one thousand floor levels. The man climbs up to the tenth floor. He will of course see a lot more then of the first floor, right? Then go up to the one hundredth. or thousandth.
The further a person climbs up, the more information that will become accesible to his field of vision. And naturally, his level of understanding, will be entirely different. Although whatever the person learned at each level will be the truth, to a certain extent.
Lets make a parallel with mosaics. If a mosaic is made of 100 pieces and let's say that the first floor is a one piece of the puzzle, on the second floor- two pieces, and on the hundredth – the hundredth piece.On each floor a person will see a piece of the mosaic. How much of a whole mosaic can a person can see on the first floor? Not much.
That is, in order to lay down the whole picture, a person should have, in my opinion, at least 70% of the whole mosaic. Then he can consider that errors might still occur because he is missing 30 pieces, and since each piece can be crucial for the next level of perception, but this is not on the same level. Therefore, this is an objective reason.
And as to the subjective aspect: this is the human desire not to understand nature, unfortunately, but rather to enjoy oneself looking into it. That is to say, “I’ve achieved some understanding and I think that's enough. I’ve reached the top, and nothing exists beyond, and can’t exist, because I believe it to be so”.
I can say that I am very grateful to my enemies, and do you want to know why? For just one thing: because I never thought that what I had learned was the highest level and that there was nothing more beyond it. However, when you are teaching yourself, you perceive only what you came across, what you have developed already, etc.
But when enemies try to destroy you, they don’t try to destroy you where you are strong. They are looking for weak spots, gaps where you don’t know anything. And, of course, when they strike you, they hit at the places where you don’t know anything. And then, whether you want to or not, you start to act immediately, and you either find the solution, or not.
In one scenario, everything is more or less OK, but in the other, you’re dead. And so, when I had to take on quite a lot of fights, in order to get out alive from every such situation, I had to understand: what is it, where, what’s it due to, why, what for. And what did it arise from?
Another another most interesting thing, because while there is are no interaction, you maybe blindly searching for something, not know what or why. Understand? Therefore, when you don’t know where to go and what to look for, it is difficult to find a solution. But when the interaction begins, when they begin to attack you, you will know where to go and what to search for. because you know what they have used to hit you with. And you begin to study what they hit you with.
Well, I have had a specific experience with ‘a lot of time to learn’ so to speak. It was necessary to learn, and very fast, about the gaps that I hadn’t yet plugged. Maybe I would have found about these gaps in the future, but maybe not. I would have continued walked down the same corridor. But they helped me to widen the corridor as much as possible.
And so I had to, and was able to not only solve the problem, but also take into account some aspects, maybe not after each interaction, and to find fundamentally a new solution which did not exist before because I didn’t have enough pieces of the puzzle to make a whole picture.
I had so many of these stages in my life. Unfortunately, most people don’t do it and I do not understand why. It’s very strange for me. It’s a real joy if you have achieved something, and understood something, and that you become aware of things. But to think that what you have found out is all there is to know, well, that’s bullshit. I have no other way to call it. But, unfortunately, the parasitic system imposes this type of thinking: having no drive to continue to seek further, to dig deeper and deeper.
As it goes in the old joke, I need to defuse the atmosphere a bit. It’s an American anecdote, an intriguing one about the inner voice. A cowboy is riding the prairie. The inner voice says to him, “Stop the horse, get off the horse, get a shovel and dig. There is a treasure here.” The cowboy digs for a long time and then asks, “How much longer do I need to dig?” The inner voice replies, “Dig more”. He continues to dig and has finally dug a very deep hole. “There’s nothing here! Who would bury anything so deep?” “Keep digging.” He digs deeper and hits upon a big treasure chest. The inner voice says, “Wow, what a trick I’ve just played.”
So, sometimes you have to dig deeper, even when it seems pointless. This is because there are imposed patterns of thinking that make us blind to opportunities, and make things seem meaningless to us. To avoid the blindness we have to try to get away from these patterns.
And, once again, it doesn’t mean you have to reject everything. "Everything that has been done before can be thrown away, and the truth will only be created from new things from now on" This is bullshit too. But we need to assess and comprehend everything that has been created thus far. After all, progress can’t be stopped because some people still believe that the earth is flat and the whole world revolves around it, don’t you agree?
Although some still think this, and I've already talked about it. There is a flat-earth society. These people still believe that the earth is flat and that the world and all the stars revolve around our Earth. Well, as they say, it’s their choice!
But all the others, the vast majority, are already well aware that the Earth really is round, and that it is not the centre of the universe, etc.
The situation has changed and a little more information is available now. Though, subjectively, when each of us here wakes up in the morning, we don’t see ourselves or the Earth moving. We seem to be standing still in one place, while the sun rises in the east, goes around, sets in the west. So, who is moving, if we aren’t moving?
Our senses deceive us. The illusion is created that we are not moving and that the Earth is not moving, but the other way around. Although these are objective facts, they are deceptively incomplete. You can’t be so shortsighted and dwell forever on something created by someone else. Because every creation is just one step forward.
If modern science officially declares that it doesn’t know about 90% of the universe matter. Think about that - 90%! I can understand if they don’t know about 5%, 2%, 1% of the matter. This would be acceptable. Even 30% is still acceptable. But when they officially state that they knew nothing about 90% of it, and still claim to possess the absolute truth, then it sounds like a mental illness.
So, now we will move on to the questions that have already been written here. A lot of questions were sent by Internet, but I ask those people who sent them to please not be offended, as I will be mostly answering questions received from people in this hall. Because people came here and many arrived from far away. Also it’s questionable if I have the time to answer all questions.